4.3 Article

Early clinical and neuroradiological worsening after radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma: Tumour progression or radionecrosis?

Journal

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 331-334

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.11.003

Keywords

Glioblastoma; Temozolomide; Radionecrosis; Recurrence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: This study investigates the diagnosis and management of patients with resected brain glioblastomas who presented early clinical and neuroradiological worsening after the completion of the Stupp protocol. Its aim is to discuss the occurrence of early radionecrosis. Methods: Fifty patients with brain glioblastoma treated by surgical resection and Stupp protocol were reviewed; 15 among them (30%) had early clinical and neuroradiological worsening at the 6-month follow-up. The MR spectroscopy and surgical findings of these patients are reviewed. Results: MR spectroscopy was in favour of tumour recurrence in 14 among 15 patients and showed radionecrosis in one. Among 10 patients who were reoperated on, 7 had histologically verified turnout recurrence or regrowth, whereas in 3 histopathology showed necrosis without evidence of tumour. The 7 patients with tumour progression had prevalence of focal neuroradiological signs (6/7) and a survival of 7.5-12 months (median survival 10 months). The 4 patients with early radionecrosis (including one patient who was not reoperated on) had clinical worsening with mental deterioration, confusion and ataxia, and MR spectroscopy positive for turnout recurrence in 3. Three were alive 24-30 months after the end of the radiotherapy, whereas one died at 40 months. Conclusion: Early radionecrosis after the Stupp protocol is not a rare event due to the radiosensitization effect of temozolomide. This phenomenon may predict a durable response to radiotherapy. MR spectroscopy may simulate turnout recurrence. A correct diagnosis is necessary to avoid useless reoperations and incorrect withdrawal of temozolomide. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available