4.1 Article

Saliva urea nitrogen dipstick - a novel bedside diagnostic tool for acute kidney injury

Journal

CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
Volume 82, Issue 6, Pages 358-367

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CN108370

Keywords

acute kidney injury; blood urea nitrogen; diagnostic tools; saliva dipstick; saliva urea nitrogen

Funding

  1. ISN
  2. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Measurement of saliva urea nitrogen (SUN) may be valuable in the screening of kidney failure. Here we evaluate the diagnostic performance of SUN dipsticks in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Material and methods: We measured SUN and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) in hospitalized patients diagnosed with AKI based on Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN)-criteria. After collection, saliva was transferred to a colorimetric SUN dipstick. We then compared the resultant test- pad color to six standardized color fields indicating SUN of 5 - 14 (# 1), 15 - 24 (# 2), 25 - 34 (#3), 35 - 54 (#4), 55 - 74 (#5), and >= 75 (#6) mg/ dL, respectively. We assessed the performance of SUN and BUN to discriminate AKIN 3 from earlier stages by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC ROC). Results: We enrolled 44 patients (59.5 +/- 18 years, 58% female; pre- renal AKI: 67%; renal 24%; post- renal 9%) in AKIN stages 1 (59%), 2 (16%), and 3 (25%). SUN and BUN levels were correlated (Spearman rank Rs = 0.69; p < 0.001, n = 44) with the highest correlation in AKIN 1 (Rs = 0.63, p = 0.001, n = 26). SUN allowed a significant discrimination of AKIN 3 from earlier stages (AUC ROC 0.91; 95% CI 0.80 - 1.0), which was comparable to the diagnostic performance of BUN (AUC ROC 0.90; 95% CI 0.78 - 1.0). Conclusions: SUN dipsticks allow the discrimination of AKIN 3 from earlier AKI stages. This low-technology approach may aid the screening of severe AKI in areas where laboratory resources are scarce.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available