4.1 Article

Urinary KIM-1, IL-18 and Cys-c as early predictive biomarkers in gadolinium-based contrast-induced nephropathy in elderly patients

Journal

CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages 349-354

Publisher

DUSTRI-VERLAG DR KARL FEISTLE
DOI: 10.5414/CN107829

Keywords

gadolinium-based contrast media; contrast media; contrast-induced nephropathy; acute kidney injury; elderly

Funding

  1. Scientific Foundation Of Hunan Province [2010FJ6008, 2008JT3005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: This study was designed to investigate whether urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), interleukin-18 (IL-18) and cystatin C (Cys-C) are early predictive biomarkers for gadolinium-based contrast-induced nephropathy (Gd-CIN) in elderly patients undergoing gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: 60 elderly patients undergoing enhanced MRI using gadolinium-based contrast media were enrolled. Urine samples were collected before, and 24 and 48 hours after the procedure, and KIM-1, IL-18 and Cys-C levels were measured by using an ELLSA kit respectively. Serum samples before, and 24 and 48 hours after the procedure were also collected, and creatinine was measured by automatic biochemical analyzer. Results: Gd-CIN was diagnosed in 8 of 60 (13.3%) patients. At 24 hours after MRI with gadolinium administration in the Gd-CIN group, the urinary KIM-1, IL-18 and Cys-C were significantly increased. Logistic regression analysis showed that urinary KIM-1 and IL-18 at 24 hours after gadolinium injection were independent predictive markers of Gd-CIN. The predictable time of acute kidney injury (AKI) onset determined by urinary KIM-1, IL-18 and Cys-C was 24 hours earlier than by serum creatinine. Conclusions: Urinary KIM-1, IL-18 and Cys-C could be early predictive biomarkers of Gd-CIN in elderly patients, which showed a good performance in early diagnosis of Gd-GUN as compared with serum creatinine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available