4.7 Article

Impact of changes in CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints for susceptibility in bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 894-900

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03673.x

Keywords

Bloodstream infections; breakpoints; cephalosporins; Escherichia coli; extended-spectrum ss-lactamases; therapy

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. European Development Regional Fund
  4. Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD06/0008]
  5. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [070190, 10/02021, 10/01955]
  6. Junta de Andalucia [0063/2006, 0048/2008, CTS-5259]
  7. Merck
  8. Wyeth
  9. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 894900 Abstract The impact of recent changes in and discrepancies between the breakpoints for cephalosporins and other antimicrobials, as determined by CLSI and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), was analysed in patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli in Spain, was analysed. We studied a cohort of 191 episodes of bloodstream infection caused by ESBL-producing E. coli in 13 Spanish hospitals; the susceptibility of isolates to different antimicrobials was investigated by microdilution and interpreted according to recommendations established in 2009 and 2010 by CLSI, and in 2011 by EUCAST. Overall, 58.6% and 14.7% of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime, and 35.1% and 14.7% to cefepime using the CLSI-2010 and EUCAST-2009/2011 recommendations, respectively (all isolates would have been considered resistant using the previous guidelines). Discrepancies between the CLSI-2010 and the EUCAST-2011 recommendations were statistically significant for other antimicrobials only in the case of amikacin (98.4% versus 75.9% of susceptible isolates; p <0.01). The results varied depending on the ESBL produced. No significant differences were found in the percentage of patients classified as receiving appropriate therapy, following the different recommendations. Four out of 11 patients treated with active cephalosporins according to CLSI-2010 guidelines died (all had severe sepsis or shock); these cases would have been considered resistant according to EUCAST-2011. In conclusion, by using current breakpoints, extended-spectrum cephalosporins would be regarded as active agents for treating a significant proportion of patients with bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available