4.7 Article

Peripheral facial palsy in patients with tick-borne encephalitis

Journal

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages 1027-1032

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03719.x

Keywords

Borrelia infection; cranial nerves; aetiology; facial palsy; Slovenia; tick-borne encephalitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18: 10271032 Abstract Although tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) has been recognized in Europe for more than 70 years and has been the topic of numerous reports, information on the involvement of facial nerves in the course of the disease is limited. Our study conducted at a single medical centre revealed that facial nerve involvement in the course of TBE in Central Europe is (i) infrequentit was found in only 11 of 1218 (0.9%) consecutive adult patients diagnosed with TBE; (ii) manifests with unilateral or rarely bilateral peripheral facial palsy (PFP) (nine and two patients, respectively); (iii) appears late in the course of acute illnessin our patients 1020 days after the onset of the meningoencephalitic phase of TBE, and often after defervescence (in 8/11 patients; 613 days after normalization of body temperature); (iv) develops more often in patients with more severe illness, i.e. more frequently in those with encephalitic than in those with meningitic clinical presentation, and more commonly in patients with monophasic than biphasic illness; and (v) has a favourable outcomeour patients had a clinically complete recovery from PFP within 790 (median 30) days after its onset. Moreover, the finding of Borrelia infection in 3/11 (27.3%) patients (diagnosis of confirmed Lyme neuroborreliosis was established in 1/11 patients and two patients fulfilled criteria for possible Lyme neuroborreliosis) suggests that in countries where TBE and Lyme borreliosis are endemic, concomitant infection with Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato should be considered and searched for in patients who develop PFP in the course of TBE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available