4.6 Article

Association between Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Clinical Outcomes among Patients with ESRD

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13091211

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Amgen
  2. Kyowa Hakko Kirin (Japan)
  3. Sanofi Renal
  4. Abbott
  5. Baxter
  6. Vifor Fresenius Renal Pharma
  7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services project entitled The Evaluation of the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Disease Management Demonstration [500-00-0028]
  8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectives Oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) was provided to ESRD patients with hypoalbuminemia as part of Fresenius Medical Care Health Plan's (FMCHP) disease management. This study evaluated the association between FMCHP's ONS program and clinical outcomes. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Analyses included FMCHP patients with ONS indication (n=470) defined as 2-month mean albumin <3.8 g/dl until reaching a 3-month mean >= 3.8 g/dl from February 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008. Patients did not receive ONS if deemed inappropriate or refused. Patients on ONS were compared with patients who were not, despite meeting ONS indication. Patients with ONS indication regardless of use were compared with Medicare patients with similar serum albumin levels from the 2007 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Clinical Performance Measures Project (CPM). Cox models calculated adjusted hospitalization and mortality risks at 1 year. Results Among patients with indication for ONS, 276 received supplements and 194 did not. ONS use was associated with 0.058 g/dl higher serum albumin overall (P=0.02); this difference decreased by 0.001 g/dl each month (P=0.05) such that the difference was 0.052 g/dl (P=0.04) in month 6 and the difference was no longer significant in month 12. In analyses based on ONS use, ONS patients had lower hospitalization at 1 year (68.4%; P<0.01) versus patients without ONS (88.7%), but there was no significant reduction in mortality risk (P=0.29). In analyses based on ONS indication, patients with indication had lower mortality at 1 year (16.2%) compared with CPM patients (23.4%; P<0.01). Conclusions These findings suggest that ONS use was associated with significantly lower hospitalization rates but had no significant effect on mortality in a disease management setting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 100-107, 2013. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13091211

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available