4.6 Article

Predictors of Estimated GFR Decline in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Preserved Kidney Function

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07650711

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectives This study examined predictors of the annual decline in estimated GFR (eGFR) in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function. Design, setting, participants, & measurements In a prospective, observational cohort study, 1682 individuals with type 2 diabetes and baseline eGFR >= 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (as estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) were followed for 10 years. Linear regression was used to estimate participants' changes in eGFR over time. Results During follow-up, 263 (15.6%) individuals had a rapid eGFR decline defined as >4.0% per year. Average eGFR decline was -5.8 +/- 3 and -0.6 +/- 2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year in rapid decliners and nondecliners, respectively. Compared with normotensive, normoalbuminuric patients (-0.2 +/- 0.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), those with hypertension (-1.0 +/- 0.1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), hemoglobin A(1c)>= 7% (-1.0 +/- 0.1 ral/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), longer diabetes duration (-1.0 +/- 0.1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), obesity (-1.2 +/- 0.1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), insulin treatment (-1.5 +/- 0.1 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), microalbuminuria (-1.3 +/- 0.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year), or macroalbuminuria (-2.7 +/- 0.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year) had significantly faster age-adjusted annual eGFR declines. Multivariable linear regression analyses revealed that albuminuria (P<0.001) was the strongest predictor of annual eGFR decline. Other independent predictors of annual eGFR decline were older age, hypertension, insulin treatment, and lower baseline eGFR. Conclusions Annual eGFR decline is predicted by multiple modifiable risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 401-408, 2012. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07650711

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available