4.6 Article

Pregnancy and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Challenge in All CKD Stages

Journal

Publisher

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.07911109

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a challenge for pregnancy. Its recent classification underlines the importance of its early phases. This study's aim was to evaluate outcomes of pregnancy according to CKD stage versus low-risk pregnancies followed in the same center. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: The prospective analysis was conducted from January 2000 to May 2009 with the start of observation at referral and end of observation 1 month after delivery. Ninety-one singleton deliveries were studied; 267 low-risk singleton pregnancies served as controls. Because of the lack of hard end points (death, start of dialysis), surrogate end points were analyzed (cesarean section, prematurity, neonatal intensive care). Results: CKD outcome was worse than physiologic pregnancies: preterm delivery (44% versus 5%); cesarean section (44% versus 25%); and need for neonatal intensive care (26% versus 1%). The differences were highly significant in stage 1 CKD (61 cases) versus controls (CKD stage 1: cesarean sections = 57%, preterm delivery = 33%, intensive care = 18%). In CKD, proteinuria and hypertension were correlated with outcomes [proteinuria dichotomized at 1 g/24 h at referral: need for intensive care, relative risk (RR) = 4.16 (1.05 to 16.46); hypertension: preterm delivery, RR = 7.24 (2.30 to 22.79); cesarean section, RR = 5.70 (1.69 to 19.24)]. Statistical significance across stages was reached for preterm delivery [RR = 3.32 (1.09 to 10.13)]. Conclusions: CKD is a challenge for pregnancy from early stages. Strict follow-up is needed for CKD patients, even when there is normal renal function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 844-855, 2010. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07911109

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available