4.3 Article

Elite Athletes' Perceptions of the Effects of Illicit Drug Use on Athletic Performance

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 189-192

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181df5f87

Keywords

sport; ecstasy; cannabis; cocaine; athlete; Australia; risk perception

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the perceived risks and benefits that elite athletes associate with illicit drugs and their beliefs concerning the effects of recreational drug use on athletic performance. Design: Self-administered survey. Participants: Nine hundred seventy-four elite athletes (mean age, 23 years; range, 18-30 years) were recruited from 8 national sporting organizations in Australia and the Australian Institute of Sport. Interventions: Participants completed a self-administered survey that included questions exploring participants' perceptions regarding the effects of illicit drug use on physical performance. Setting: National sporting organization meetings or competitions. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was risk perception on athletic performance associated with illicit drug use. Results: The majority of athletes believed that illicit drug use would impact negatively on athletic performance. The main perceived effects of illicit drugs on athletic performance were physical and mental functioning. A minority of athletes indicated that drug use would not impact on physical performance when taken during the off-season or in moderation. Conclusions: The main risks perceived in association with illicit drug use were short-term consequences, such as physical and mental functioning, rather than long-term health consequences. The current findings may contribute to the development of harm reduction strategies that communicate drug-related consequences to elite athletes in an appropriate and effective manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available