4.3 Article

Cardiac Biomarkers and Exercise Duration and Intensity During a Cycle-Touring Event

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 293-299

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181ab3c9d

Keywords

cardiac marker; exercise; myocardium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the influence of age, training status, race time, and exercise intensity on the appearance of cardiac biomarkers after a cycle-touring event. Design: Pre-post exercise measurements. Setting: University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. Participants: Ninety-one amateur cyclists. Intervention: The 2005 Quebrantahuesos cycle-touring event (distance: 206 kin; altitude difference: 3800 m). Main Outcome Measures: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) were measured the day before and immediately after the race. Heart rate (HR) monitoring was performed on 55 cyclists during the race to evaluate exercise intensity. Results: cTnI and NT-pro-BNP were significantly elevated immediately post race, with 43% of participants exhibiting cTnI levels greater than 0.04 mu g/L and 65% of the participants measuring NT-pro-BNP levels greater than 125 ng/L. The cTnI increase was significantly associated with mean exercise intensity HR (r = 0.36, P < 0.01) but was not associated with age, training status, or race time. The increase in NT-pro-BNP correlated,with race time (r = 0.40, P < 0.001) and training status (r = -0.36, P < 0.001) but was not associated with age or exercise intensity HR measures. Conclusions: These results suggest that, in part, exercise intensity (HR) is responsible for the cTnI increase and that race time is responsible for the increase in NT-pro-BNP. Future standardized endurance exercise trials are recommended to further elucidate the potentially differential effects of training status, exercise time, and intensity on post-exercise increases in cTnI and NT-pro-BNP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available