4.4 Article

Motor Imagery in People With a History of Back Pain, Current Back Pain, Both, or Neither

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 1070-1075

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000066

Keywords

motor imagery; back pain; left/right judgments

Funding

  1. NHMRC [630431, 1045322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: There is mounting evidence that cortical maps are disrupted in chronic limb pain and that these disruptions may contribute to the problem and be a viable target for treatment. Little is known as to whether this is also the case for the most common and costly chronic pain-back pain. Objectives: To investigate the effects of back pain characteristics on the performance of left/right trunk judgment tasks, a method of testing the integrity of cortical maps. Methods: A total of 1008 volunteers completed an online left/right trunk judgment task in which they judged whether a model was rotated or laterally flexed to the left or right in a series of images. Results: Participants who had back pain at the time of testing were less accurate than pain-free controls (P = 0.027), as were participants who were pain free but had a history of back pain (P < 0.01). However, these results were driven by an interaction such that those with current back pain and a history of back pain were less accurate (mean [95% CI] = 76% [74%-78%]) than all other groups (>84% [83%-85%]). Discussion: Trunk motor imagery performance is reduced in people with a history of back pain when they are in a current episode. This is consistent with disruption of cortical proprioceptive representation of the trunk in this group. On the basis of this result, we propose a conceptual model speculating a role of this measure in understanding the development of chronic back pain, a model that can be tested in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available