4.4 Article

Pressure and Activity-related Allodynia in Delayed-onset Muscle Pain

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 42-47

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f04818

Keywords

delayed-onset muscle soreness; stretch injury

Funding

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, Bethesda, MD [1KO1 AR050146-01A1]
  2. University of Missouri (Research Council), Columbia, MO
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K01AR050146] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Muscle pain from different activities was tested with the muscle pain expected to vary in ways that may clarify mechanisms of activity-induced exacerbation of myofascial pain. Methods: Participants [N = 20; 45% women; 23 y old (SD = 2.09)] consented to participate in a 6 session protocol. Bilateral muscle pain ratings and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were collected before and for 4 days after lengthening (ie, eccentric) muscle contractions were completed with the nondominant elbow flexors to induce delayed-onset muscle pain. The muscle pain ratings were collected with the arms in several conditions (eg, resting, moving, and contracting in a static position) and PPTs were collected with the arms. Results: In the ipsilateral arm, muscle pain ratings at rest and during activity significantly increased whereas PPTs significantly decreased after the eccentrics (eta(2)s = 0.17 to 0.54). The greatest increases in pain occurred during arm extension without applied load, in which there was more stretching but less force than isometrics. In the contralateral arm, neither muscle pain nor PPTs changed from baseline. Discussion: These results resemble earlier electrophysiology studies showing differential sensitization across stimuli and support that increased depth of information about aggravating activities from clinical patients is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available