4.4 Article

Cross Validation of the Current Opioid Misuse Measure to Monitor Chronic Pain Patients on Opioid Therapy

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages 770-776

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f195ba

Keywords

substance abuse; chronic pain; opioids; addiction; aberrant drug behaviors; cross validation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD [DA015617, DA024298]
  2. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) is a self-report measure of risk for aberrant medication-related behavior among persons with chronic pain who are prescribed opioids for pain. It was developed to complement predictive screeners of opioid misuse potential and improve a clinician's ability to periodically assess a patient's risk for opioid misuse. The aim of this study was to cross-validate the COMM with a sample of chronic noncancer pain patients. Methods: Two hundred and twenty-six participants prescribed opioids for pain were recruited from 5 pain management centers in the United States. Participants completed the 17-item COMM and a series of self-report measures. Patients were rated by their treating physician, had a urine toxicology screen, and were classified on the Aberrant Drug Behavior index. Results: The reliability and predictive validity in this cross validation as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) were found to be highly significant (AUC = 0.79) and not significantly different from the AUC obtained in the original validation study (AUC = 0.81). Reliability (coefficient alpha) was 0.83, which is comparable to the 0.86 obtained in the original sample. Discussion: Results of the cross validation suggest that the psychometric parameters of the COMM are not based solely on unique characteristics of the initial validation sample. The COMM seems to be a reliable and valid screening tool to help detect current aberrant drug-related behavior among chronic pain patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available