4.4 Article

Sympathetic Dysfunction in Long-term Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 128-131

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b5effc

Keywords

sympathetic nervous system; laser Doppler; CRPS I; outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Malfunction of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is common in early complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS 1). This study was designed to evaluate the function of the SNS in patients with chronic CRPS I and to correlate the obtained data with hand function measurements. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients of both the sexes in whom the diagnosis of CRPS I of the upper extremity had been established for at least 3 years before they were included in the study. Besides a hand outcomes questionnaire [Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, (MHQ)] the patients underwent a standardized testing of the peripheral sympathetic nervous system (pSNS) using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF). Results: Mean time since initial diagnosis was 4.6 +/- 2.1 years. The mean MHQ score of the affected limb was 57.3 +/- 17 compared with 69.4 +/- 13.7 for the unaffected hand (P = 0.002). Twenty patients (62.5%) still demonstrated pathologic results regarding the pSNS function (mean sympathetic reflex 0.18 +/- 0.11, normal range >0.38). We found no statistically significant correlation between pSNS function either with the clinical outcome as measured by MHQ (r = 0.246; P = 0.175), or with the level of pain (r = 0.132; P = 0.473). Conclusions: Even 5 years after the diagnosis of CRPS I of the upper extremity we detected significant impairments of the pSNS in nearly two thirds of our patients. Patients still have pain and present with a significant deterioration of their hand function in comparison with the not affected hand. In our study we could not identify my correlation between pSNS function and clinical outcome as measured by MHQ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available