4.4 Article

The role of TNF-α in patients with chronic low back pain -: A prospective comparative longitudinal study

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 273-278

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31816111d3

Keywords

TNF-alpha; chronic low back pain; multidisciplinary therapy; inflammatory cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: In this prospective longitudinal clinical study with a matched-pair design, we evaluated the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and its clinical relevance in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: One hundred twenty patients with chronic low back pain were matched to a healthy control group. Patients and controls were prospectively followed for 6 months. At 4 fixed time points (day 0, day 10, day 20, and 6mo) blood samples were taken and TNF-alpha levels compared in the 2 groups, and correlations with pain level and clinical function were analyzed. Results: At the beginning and at all other time points, there was a significantly higher proportion of TNF-alpha positive participants in the patients group than in the control group. The proportion of TNF-alpha positive patients decreased during the first 10 days of a multidisciplinary therapy in the patient group, but after this initial period, TNF-alpha levels remained constantly high with no further change until the final follow-up. In the healthy control group, the proportion of participants with positive TNF-alpha levels remained constant throughout the entire period. No significant correlation between TNF-alpha levels and pain or clinical function was detected. Discussion: TNF-alpha seems to have a significant role in patients with chronic low back pain. However, the pathophysiology of this process, the clinical relevance of TNF-alpha and, especially, its part in a potential therapy regimen in these patients need to be more closely examined and defined in additional studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available