4.7 Article

Is the Low-Hanging Fruit Worth Picking for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs?

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages 587-592

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis494

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new antimicrobial stewardship program can be overwhelmed at the breadth of interventions and education required to conduct a successful program. The expression low-hanging fruit, in reference to stewardship, refers to selecting the most obtainable targets rather than confronting more complicated management issues. These targets include intravenous-to-oral conversions, batching of intravenous antimicrobials, therapeutic substitutions, and formulary restriction. These strategies require fewer resources and less effort than other stewardship activities; however, they are applicable to a variety of healthcare settings, including limited-resource hospitals, and have demonstrated significant financial savings. Our stewardship program found that staged and systematic interventions that focus on obvious areas of need, that is, low hanging fruit, provided early successes in our expanded program with a substantial cumulative cost savings of $832 590.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available