4.7 Article

Appraising Contemporary Strategies to Combat Multidrug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections-Proceedings and Data From the Gram-Negative Resistance Summit

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 53, Issue -, Pages S33-S55

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consensus Medical Communication
  2. Astellas
  3. Sanofi Pasteur
  4. Astrazeneca
  5. Therafan
  6. Forest Laboratories and Novartis
  7. TRIUS
  8. Covidien
  9. BARD
  10. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K23HL096054]
  11. University of Colorado School of Medicine
  12. Consensus Medical Communications
  13. Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.
  14. Merck
  15. Cubist
  16. Pfizer
  17. Johnson Johnson
  18. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  19. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The emerging problem of antibiotic resistance, especially among Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), has become a serious threat to global public health. Very few new antibacterial classes with activity against antibiotic-resistant GNB have been brought to market. Renewed and growing attention to the development of novel compounds targeting antibiotic-resistant GNB, as well as a better understanding of strategies aimed at preventing the spread of resistant bacterial strains and preserving the efficacy of existing antibiotic agents, has occurred. The Gram-Negative Resistance Summit convened national opinion leaders for the purpose of analyzing current literature, epidemiologic trends, clinical trial data, therapeutic options, and treatment guidelines related to the management of antibiotic-resistant GNB infections. After an in-depth analysis, the Summit investigators were surveyed with regard to 4 clinical practice statements. The results then were compared with the same survey completed by 138 infectious disease and critical care physicians and are the basis of this article.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available