4.7 Article

Interactions Between Buprenorphine and the Protease Inhibitors Darunavir-Ritonavir and Fosamprenavir-Ritonavir

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 414-423

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/cir799

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health [R01 DA 13004, K24 DA 23359, R01 DA 10100]
  2. NCRR/NIH [M01RR00065]
  3. NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI [UL1 RR024131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist used for opioid dependence treatment and pain management, and the protease inhibitors (PIs) darunavir-ritonavir and fosamprenavir-ritonavir. Methods. The pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and its metabolites and symptoms of opioid withdrawal or excess were compared in opioid-dependent, buprenorphine-naloxone-maintained, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative volunteers (11 for darunavir-ritonavir and 10 for fosamprenavir-ritonavir) before and after 15 days of PI administration. PI pharmacokinetics and adverse effects were compared between the buprenorphine-maintained participants and an equal number of sex-, age-, race-, and weight-matched, healthy, non-opioid-dependent volunteers who received darunavir-ritonavir or fosamprenavir-ritonavir but not buprenorphine. Results. There were no significant changes in buprenorphine or PI plasma levels and no significant changes in medication adverse effects or opioid withdrawal. Increased concentrations of the inactive metabolite buprenorphine3- glucuronide suggested that darunavir-ritonavir and fosamprenavir-ritonavir induced glucuronidation of buprenorphine. Conclusions. Dose adjustments are not likely to be necessary when buprenorphine and darunavir-ritonavir or fosamprenavir-ritonavir are coadministered for the treatment of opioid dependence and HIV disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available