4.7 Article

Health Care System and Policy Factors Influencing Engagement in HIV Medical Care: Piecing Together the Fragments of a Fractured Health Care Delivery System

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages S238-S246

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciq048

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [K23MH082641]
  2. University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for AIDS Research [P30AI27767]
  3. CFAR- Network of Integrated Clinical Systems [R24AI067039-1]
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Positive Charge Initiative
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Positive Charge
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Gilead Sciences
  8. Pfizer
  9. Tibotec Therapeutics
  10. Achillion Pharmaceuticals
  11. Avexa
  12. Boehringer Ingelheim
  13. Gilead
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Merck
  16. Monogram Biosciences
  17. Panacos
  18. Progenics
  19. Roche
  20. Serono
  21. Tanox
  22. Tibotec
  23. Trimeris
  24. Vertex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grounded in a socio-ecological framework, we describe salient health care system and policy factors that influence engagement in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinical care. The discussion emphasizes successful programs and models of service delivery and highlights the limitations of current, fragmented health care system components in supporting effective, efficient, and sustained patient engagement across a continuum of care. A fundamental need exists for improved synergies between funding and service agencies that provide HIV testing, prevention, treatment, and supportive services. We propose a feedback loop whereby actionable, patient-level surveillance of HIV testing and engagement in care activities inform educational outreach and resource allocation to support integrated testing and linkage to care plus service delivery. Ongoing surveillance of programmatic performance in achieving defined benchmarks for linkage of patients who have newly diagnosed HIV infection and retention of those patients in care is imperative to iteratively inform further educational efforts, resource allocation, and refinement of service delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available