4.7 Editorial Material

Influenza Virus Resistance to Antiviral Agents: A Plea for Rational Use

Journal

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 48, Issue 9, Pages 1254-1256

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/598989

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI033144, N01 AI040065, R01 AI048793, R37 AI048793, AI 33144, R01 AI048793-09, N01AI40065, R01 AI033144-15, AI 48793] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI033144, R01AI048793, R37AI048793] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although influenza vaccine can prevent influenza virus infection, the only therapeutic options to treat influenza virus infection are antiviral agents. At the current time, nearly all influenza A/H3N2 viruses and a percentage of influenza A/H1N1 viruses are adamantane resistant, which leaves only neuraminidase inhibitors available for treatment of infection with these viruses. In December 2008, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new data demonstrating that a high percentage of circulating influenza A/H1N1 viruses are now resistant to oseltamivir. In addition, oseltamivir-resistant influenza B and A/H5N1 viruses have been identified. Thus, use of monotherapy for influenza virus infection is irrational and may contribute to mutational pressure for further selection of antiviral-resistant strains. History has demonstrated that monotherapy for influenza virus infection leads to resistance, resulting in the use of a new monotherapy agent followed by resistance to that new agent and thus resulting in a background of viruses resistant to both drugs. We argue that combination antiviral therapy, new guidelines for indications for treatment, point-of-care diagnostic testing, and a universal influenza vaccination recommendation are critical to protecting the population against influenza virus and to preserving the benefits of antiviral agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available