4.4 Article

Necessity of Keratinized Tissues for Dental Implants: A Clinical, Immunological, and Radiographic Study

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cid.12079

Keywords

clinical study; implant; inflammation; radiographs; soft tissue grafting

Funding

  1. Research Center of Hacettepe University [010D09201002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundNecessity of keratinized tissues (KTs) for maintaining health around dental implants (DIs) remains as a controversial issue. PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the effects of KT width (KTW) on peri-implant tissues by evaluating peri-implant clinical and inflammatory parameters. Materials and MethodsSixty DIs were included in this 6-month longitudinal study. After classifying DI based on the presence of KTs at the buccal aspect as with adequate/inadequate KTW, DIs were randomly assigned into three study groups. In the first group, while free gingival graft (FGG) was performed, DIs in maintenance (M) group were followed up by standardized maintenance procedures at baseline, first, third, and sixth months as with DI with adequate KTW (Control). Clinical parameters, peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) volume, PISF Interleukin 1 concentration, and bone loss were analyzed. ResultsSignificant improvements in clinical and immunological parameters were noted only for FGG for the whole study period. Statistical differences detected between the treatment groups (FGG vs M) were for gingival index at all time points and for PISF volume at sixth month. For the other parameters evaluated, while lower values were observed for FGG, statistically no differences were noted between the groups. ConclusionsBased on the results of this study, it can be suggested that FGG performed around DIs lacking KT is a reliable method, leading to significant improvements in clinical and inflammatory parameters. Further long-term studies including more DIs are needed to clarify the role of KT on maintenance of DIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available