4.7 Article

MR-detected changes in liver fat, abdominal fat, and vertebral bone marrow fat after a four-week calorie restriction in obese women

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1272-1280

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24908

Keywords

bone marrow fat fraction; obesity; weight loss; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)

Funding

  1. Philips Healthcare
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF [FKZ: 01EA1329]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo determine changes in the bone marrow fat fraction (BMFF) in obesity after dietary intervention in comparison with changes in abdominal fat, liver fat, and serum lipids. Materials and MethodsTwenty obese (BMI 34.923.8 kg/m(2)) women participated in a 4-week dietary intervention of 800 kcal/d plus additional vegetables. They underwent anthropometric and blood value measurements before and after the intervention. Abdominal 3T MRI was performed to measure changes in subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume and single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to measure fat content changes in the liver and L5 vertebral body. ResultsThe greatest relative change after dietary intervention was found in the liver (-40.3%), followed by VAT volume (-15.1%), serum lipids (-12.6 to -14.5%), and SAT volume (-8.5%). There were no statistically significant changes in BMFF after dietary intervention (P=0.39), but absolute changes in the BMFF were positively associated with SAT volume (r=0.489) and negatively associated with nonadipose tissue volume (r=-0.493) before dietary intervention. ConclusionBone marrow behaves differently compared to SAT volume, VAT volume, liver fat, and serum lipids after a 4-week dietary intervention in obesity and BMFF changes depend on abdominal tissue volumes before intervention. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:1272-1280.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available