4.7 Article

Accuracy of multiecho magnitude-based MRI (M-MRI) for estimation of hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) in children

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1223-1232

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24888

Keywords

MRI; MRS; PDFF; proton density fat fraction; NAFLD; liver steatosis

Funding

  1. NIDDK [R56 DK090350, R01 DK088831]
  2. NCRR for the Clinical and Translational Research Institute at UCSD [UL1 RR031980]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo assess accuracy of magnitude-based magnetic resonance imaging (M-MRI) in children to estimate hepatic proton density fat fraction (PDFF) using two to six echoes, with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) -measured PDFF as a reference standard. MethodsThis was an IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant, single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively between 2008 and 2013 in children with known or suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Two hundred eighty-six children (8-20 [mean 14.22.5] years; 182 boys) underwent same-day MRS and M-MRI. Unenhanced two-dimensional axial spoiled gradient-recalled-echo images at six echo times were obtained at 3T after a single low-flip-angle (10 degrees) excitation with120-ms recovery time. Hepatic PDFF was estimated using the first two, three, four, five, and all six echoes. For each number of echoes, accuracy of M-MRI to estimate PDFF was assessed by linear regression with MRS-PDFF as reference standard. Accuracy metrics were regression intercept, slope, average bias, and R-2. ResultsMRS-PDFF ranged from 0.2-40.4% (mean 13.1 +/- 9.8%). Using three to six echoes, regression intercept, slope, and average bias were 0.46-0.96%, 0.99-1.01, and 0.57-0.89%, respectively. Using two echoes, these values were 2.98%, 0.97, and 2.72%, respectively. R-2 ranged 0.98-0.99 for all methods. ConclusionUsing three to six echoes, M-MRI has high accuracy for hepatic PDFF estimation in children. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:1223-1232.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available