4.7 Article

Diffusion kurtosis imaging predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses within 4 days in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 1354-1361

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24910

Keywords

diffusion-weighted MRI; diffusion kurtosis imaging; treatment monitoring; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Funding

  1. Social development guidance projects of Fujian Province [2014Y0013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo explore the clinical value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Materials and MethodsFifty-nine patients with stage III-IVb NPC underwent four 3.0T MR scans: prior to, and on the 4th, 21st, 42nd days after NAC initiation. The parameters of DKI (corrected diffusion coefficient, D; excess diffusion kurtosis coefficient, K) and monoexponential DWI (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC) were obtained at the first three scans. Statistical methods included Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses and paired X-2 test. ResultsD((pre)) in responders group (RG) was significantly lower than nonresponders group (NRG) (1.0290.033 vs. 1.184 +/- 0.055, x10(-3) mm(2)/s, P=0.020). ADC((day4)) and D-(day4) were the most useful parameters of the two diffusional models to distinguish RG from NRG, respectively (area under the curve, 0.761 vs. 0.895). D-(day4) was more sensitive than ADC((day4)) to predict treatment response to NAC (P=0.006). ConclusionBoth DKI and monoexponential DWI showed potential to predict treatment response to NAC prior to morphological change. DKI may be superior to monoexponential DWI for predicting early response to NAC in patients with locally advanced NPC. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:1354-1361.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available