4.3 Article

Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Journal

CLINICAL IMAGING
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 110-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.06.036

Keywords

Liver; steatosis; Ultrasound (US); Computed tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32 EB001631, T32 EB001631-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK074718-01A1, R01 DK074718, R01 DK074718-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination of diffuse liver steatosis. Materials and methods: Quantification of liver steatosis on ultrasound, CT, and MRI was correlated with histopathology in 67 patients. Results: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated the highest correlation with steatosis (0.68 and 0.69, P<.01; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93). Spearman's correlation (and intraclass correlation) coefficients were lowest for ultrasound [0.54, 0.33 (0.40)] and enhanced CT [0.33, 0.39 (0.97)]. Conclusion: Opposed-phase MRI demonstrated best overall performance for determining steatosis. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available