4.5 Article

Phenotypic variability, neurological outcome and genetics background of 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 249-257

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01306.x

Keywords

early onset Parkinsonism; movement disorders in children; neurotransmitters; PKU; PTS; PTPS deficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the clinical variability and factors implied in the outcome of 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase deficiency (PTPSd). Biochemical and clinical phenotype, treatment variables, and 6-pyruvoyl-tetrahydropterin synthase (PTS) genotype, were explored retrospectively in 19 Italian patients (12 males and 7 females, aged 4 months to 33 years). According to the level of biogenic amines in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at the diagnosis, the patients were classified as mild (6) (normal level) or severe (13) (abnormal low level) form (MF and SF, respectively). Blood Phe ranged from 151 to 1053 mu mol/l in MF (mean +/- SD: 698 +/- 403) and 342-2120 mu mol/l in SF (mean +/- SD: 1175 +/- 517) (p = 0.063). Patients with MF showed a normal neurological development (a transient dystonia was detected in one), while all SF patients except one presented with severe neurological impairment and only four had a normal neurological development. The outcome of the SF was influenced by the precocity of the treatment. Serial CSF examinations revealed a decline of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid in MFs and an incomplete restoration of neurotransmitters in SFs: neither obviously affected the prognosis. PTS gene analysis detected 17 different mutations (seven so far unreported) (only one affected allele was identified in three subjects). A good correlation was found between genotype and clinical and biochemical phenotype. The occurrence of brain neurotransmitter deficiency and its early correction (by the therapy) are the main prognostic factors in PTPSd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available