4.5 Review

Review of the Lynch syndrome: history, molecular genetics, screening, differential diagnosis, and medicolegal ramifications

Journal

CLINICAL GENETICS
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 1-18

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01230.x

Keywords

colorectal cancer; endometrial cancer; hereditary cancer; hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; immunohistochemistry; Lynch syndrome; microsatellite instability; mismatch repair; mismatch repair genes

Funding

  1. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
  2. National Institutes of Health [1U01 CA 86389, CA72851]
  3. Charles F. and Mary C. Heider Chair in Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than one million patients will manifest colorectal cancer (CRC) this year of which, conservatively, approximately 3% (similar to 30,700 cases) will have Lynch syndrome (LS), the most common hereditary CRC predisposing syndrome. Each case belongs to a family with clinical needs that require genetic counseling, DNA testing for mismatch repair genes (most frequently MLH1 or MSH2) and screening for CRC. Colonoscopy is mandated, given CRC's proximal occurrence (70-80% proximal to the splenic flexure). Due to its early age of onset (average 45 years of age), colonoscopy needs to start by age 25, and because of its accelerated carcinogenesis, it should be repeated every 1 to 2 years through age 40 and then annually thereafter. Should CRC occur, subtotal colectomy may be necessary, given the marked frequency of synchronous and metachronous CRC. Because 40-60% of female patients will manifest endometrial cancer, tailored management is essential. Additional extracolonic cancers include ovary, stomach, small bowel, pancreas, hepatobiliary tract, upper uroepithelial tract, brain (Turcot variant) and sebaceous adenomas/carcinomas (Muir-Torre variant). LS explains only 10-25% of familial CRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available