4.7 Article

Patient-Reported Outcomes as Primary End Points in Clinical Trials of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 1246-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.016

Keywords

Health-Related Quality Of Life; Ulcerative Colitis; Crohn's Disease; CDAI

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Abbott
  3. Janssen
  4. Genentech
  5. Mitsubishi
  6. Ferring
  7. Norgine
  8. Tillots
  9. Vifor
  10. Shire
  11. Therakos
  12. Pharmacosmos
  13. Pilege
  14. BMS
  15. UCB-pharma
  16. Hospira
  17. Takeda
  18. ActoGeniX NV
  19. AGI Therapeutics, Inc
  20. Alba Therapeutics Corporation
  21. Albireo
  22. Alfa Wasserman
  23. Amgen
  24. AM-Pharma BV
  25. Anaphore
  26. Astellas Pharma
  27. Athersys, Inc
  28. Atlantic Healthcare Limited
  29. Aptalis
  30. BioBalance Corporation
  31. Boehringer-Ingelheim, Inc
  32. Bristol Meyers Squibb
  33. Celgene
  34. Celek Pharmaceuticals
  35. Cellerix SL
  36. Cerimon Pharmaceuticals
  37. ChemoCentryx
  38. CoMentis
  39. Cosmo Technologies
  40. Coronado Biosciences
  41. Cytokine Pharmasciences
  42. Eagle Pharmaceuticals
  43. Eisai Medical Research, Inc
  44. Elan Pharmaceuticals
  45. EnGene, Inc
  46. Eli Lilly
  47. Enteromedics
  48. Exagen Diagnostics, Inc
  49. Ferring Pharmaceuticals
  50. Flexion Therapeutics, Inc
  51. Funxional Therapeutics Limited
  52. Genzyme Corporation
  53. Roche
  54. Gilead Sciences
  55. Given Imaging
  56. Glaxo Smith Kline
  57. Human Genome Sciences
  58. Ironwood Pharmaceuticals
  59. KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  60. Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
  61. Lycera Corporation
  62. Meda Pharmaceuticals
  63. Merck Research Laboratories
  64. MerckSerono
  65. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  66. Nisshin Kyorin Pharmaceuticals Co, Ltd
  67. Novo Nordisk A/S
  68. NPS Pharmaceuticals
  69. Optimer Pharmaceuticals
  70. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc
  71. PDL Biopharma
  72. Pfizer
  73. Procter and Gamble
  74. Prometheus Laboratories
  75. ProtAb Limited
  76. Purgenesis Technologies, Inc
  77. Receptos
  78. Relypsa, Inc
  79. Salient Pharmaceuticals
  80. Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  81. Santarus
  82. Schering Plough Corporation
  83. Shire Pharmaceuticals
  84. Sigmoid Pharma Limited
  85. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc (a GSK company)
  86. S.L.A. Pharma (UK) Limited
  87. Targacept
  88. Teva Pharmaceuticals
  89. Tillotts Pharma AG
  90. TxCell SA
  91. UCB Pharma
  92. Viamet Pharmaceuticals
  93. Vascular Biogenics Limited
  94. Warner Chilcott UK Limited
  95. Novartis
  96. Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is moving from the Crohn's Disease Activity Index to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and objective measures of disease, such as findings from endoscopy. PROs will become an important aspect of assessing activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and for labeling specific drugs for this disease. PROs always have been considered in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis, and have included measurements of quality of life, disability, or fatigue. Several disease-specific scales have been developed to assess these PROs and commonly are used in clinical trials. Outcomes reported by patients in clinical trials of IBD initially focused on quality of life, measured by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire or disease-specific scales such as the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire or its shorter version. Recently considered factors include fatigue, depression and anxiety, and work productivity, as measured by the Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, the Hospital Anxiety Depression, and the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Questionnaire, respectively. However, few data are available on how treatment affects these factors in patients with IBD. Although disability generally is recognized in patients with IBD, it is not measured. The international IBD disability index currently is being validated. None of the PROs currently used in IBD were developed according to FDA guidance for PRO development. PROs will be a major primary end point of future trials. FDA guidance is needed to develop additional PROs for IBD that can be incorporated into trials, to better compare patients' experience with different therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available