4.7 Article

Certolizumab Pegol for Active Crohn's Disease: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 670-U84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.031

Keywords

Biologic; Inflammatory Bowel Disease; Inflammatory Burden

Funding

  1. UCB
  2. UCB Pharma
  3. Schering-Plough
  4. Otsuka
  5. Millennium
  6. Tillotts
  7. Abbott Laboratories
  8. Protein Design Labs
  9. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  10. Novartis
  11. Centocor
  12. Berlex
  13. Synta
  14. Schering Canada
  15. Elan/Biogen
  16. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  17. Procter Gamble
  18. Osiris
  19. Genentech
  20. AstraZeneca
  21. Centocor Ortho Biotech
  22. Essex Pharma Schering-Plough

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a pegylated-conjugated Fab' against tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Additional data are needed regarding the efficacy of induction therapy with CZP in active Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: A placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of CZP therapy in 439 adults with moderate to severe CD naive to anti-TNF therapy. Patients were randomized to receive CZP (400 mg subcutaneously) or placebo at weeks 0, 2, and 4. The primary end point was clinical remission at week 6. RESULTS: Clinical remission rates at week 6 in the CZP and placebo groups were 32% and 25% (P = .174), respectively. Remission rates at weeks 2 and 4 in the CZP and placebo groups were 23% and 16% (P = .033) and 27% and 19% (P = .063), respectively. Clinical response rates at weeks 2, 4, and 6 in the CZP and placebo groups were 33% and 20% (P = .001), 35% and 26% (P = .024), and 41% and 34% (P = .179), respectively. There were significantly greater rates of clinical remission at week 6 for CZP in patients with increased concentrations of C-reactive protein (>= 5 mg/L) at entry. Serious adverse events developed in 5% and 4% of patients in the CZP and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end point did not reach statistical significance. Significant differences between CZP and placebo were observed in patients who had increased concentrations of C-reactive protein when the study began. Future clinical trials should emphasize the treatment of patients who have objective evidence of inflammation in addition to symptoms of active disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available