4.7 Article

Clostridium difficile Strain NAP-1 Is Not Associated With Severe Disease in a Nonepidemic Setting

Journal

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 868-873

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.05.018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K30-HL04095] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI053069, R0-1 AI053069] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recent outbreaks of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in North America and in Europe with very high case-fatality rates have been associated with infection by North American Pulsed Field Type I (NAP-1) isolates. This study examined whether NAP-1 strains are associated with worse outcomes of CDI in a nonepidemic, nosocomial setting. METHODS: All cases of CDI that occurred over a 13-month period at a tertiary medical center were examined for risk factors associated with increased severity of CDI and other outcomes. Stool samples from each patient were cultured for C difficile and the resulting isolates were strain-typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: Strain types were obtained from 236 of 272 CDI samples; the NAP-1 strain was identified in 59 (25%). in this inpatient cohort of patients with CDI, the incidence of in hospital death was 12.1% and of death caused by CDI was 4.0%. Of the patients with CDI, 22.1% met the combined outcome end point of severe CDI. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, patients infected with the NAP-1 strain did not have worse outcomes compared with those infected with non-NAP-1 strains. Infection with the NAP-1 strain was correlated with admission from outside health care facilities regardless of whether symptoms of CDI began before or after admission to the study hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The NAP-1 strain of C difficile was found to cause 25% of cases of CDI in the hospital where the study was performed. However, compared with non-NAP-1 strains, CDI was not associated with increased severity of disease in this nonepidemic setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available