4.4 Article

Clinical characteristics of Graves' orbitopathy in patients showing discrepancy between levels from TBII assays and TSI bioassay

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages 591-597

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12318

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. College of Medicine, Yonsei University [6-2012-0138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To investigate clinical characteristics of patients with Graves' orbitopathy (GO) who showed discrepancies between levels of thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) and thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII). Design Comparative case series. Patients A total of 317 patients with GO in whom Mc4-TSI and M22-TRAb (third-generation TBII) were measured simultaneously. Patients were divided into four groups according to TRAb levels as followings: Group 1, TBII and TSI= median, TSI= median; Group 4, both TBII and TSI >= median. Measurement Endocrine and ophthalmic clinical manifestations in each group. Results The median value of M22-TRAb was 6 center dot 11 IU/l and that of Mc4-TSI was 415 center dot 1 (SRR%). One hundred seventeen patients were classified as Group 1, 41 patients as Group 2, 41 patients as group 3 and 118 patients as group 4. Mean CAS was significantly higher in Groups 3 (2 center dot 2) and 4 (2 center dot 2) than in Groups 1 (1 center dot 6) and 2 (1 center dot 4; P=0 center dot 001, anova). Mean modified NOSPECS scores were significantly higher (P<0 center dot 001, anova) in Groups 3 (4 center dot 1) and 4 (4 center dot 1) than in Groups 1 (3 center dot 1) and 2 (2 center dot 3). The proportion of patients with hyperthyroidism was larger in Group 2 (85 center dot 4% [35/41 patients]) than in Group 3 (48 center dot 8% [20/41 patients]; P=0 center dot 002). Conclusions GO is more active and severe in patients with predominant Mc4-TSI than in patients with predominant M22-TRAb. Patients with hyperthyroidism were more likely to be included with patients with predominant M22-TRAb than with predominant Mc4-TSI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available