4.4 Article

Evaluation of epicardial fat tissue thickness in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 571-576

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cen.12176

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Hypothyroidism, whether overt or subclinical, has multiple effects on the cardiovascular system. Epicardial fat tissue (EFT) is closely related to cardiovascular disorders and atherosclerosis. Our study aimed to assess EFT thickness and carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) displaying overt and subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). Design and patients The study included 33 patients with SCH and 24 patients with overt hypothyroidism (OH) with HT as well as 32 healthy controls. EFT thickness, CIMT, thyroid hormone levels and lipid parameters were measured in all subjects. Correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were performed for EFT thickness. Results Mean EFT thickness was 2.89 +/- 0.38, 3.53 +/- 0.92 and 4.56 +/- 1.61mm in control, SCH and OH groups, respectively (P < 0.001). EFT thickness of OH patients was high compared with SCH and control subjects (P < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). CIMT of OH patients was high compared with SCH and control subjects (P < 0.01 and < 0.001, respectively). In addition, EFT was significantly thicker in SCH patients than in controls (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that EFT thickness was significantly positively correlated with CIMT, age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, thyroid-stimulating hormone, total and LDL cholesterol and triglyceride and negatively correlated with free T4. In the regression analysis, EFT thickness retained its independent and positive association with CIMT, patient group (particularly OH) and systolic blood pressure. Conclusions Epicardial fat tissue thickness may be a useful indicator of early atherosclerosis in SCH and OH patients with HT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available