4.2 Article

Use of Primary High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Interim Clinical Guidance

Journal

JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 91-96

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000103

Keywords

HPV; screening; cancer; pap; prevention; genotypes

Funding

  1. Merck
  2. Hologic
  3. Roche
  4. Gen Probe
  5. GSK
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Photocure
  8. Cepheid
  9. PDS Biotechnologies
  10. Inovio
  11. Endocyte
  12. Fujiboro
  13. Eli Lilly
  14. Becton-Dickinson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. Recommended screening strategies were cytology or cotesting (cytology in combination with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing). These guidelines also addressed the use of hrHPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, which was not recommended for use at that time. There is now a growing body of evidence for screening with primary hrHPV testing, including a prospective US-based registration study. Thirteen experts including representatives from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Cancer Society, American Society of Cytopathology, College of American Pathologists, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, convened to provide interim guidance for primary hrHPV screening. This guidance panel was specifically triggered by an application to the FDA for a currently marketed HPV test to be labeled for the additional indication of primary cervical cancer screening. Guidance was based on literature review and review of data from the FDA registration study, supplemented by expert opinion. This document aims to provide information for health care providers who are interested in primary hrHPV testing and an overview of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for screening as well as to highlight areas in need of further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available