4.4 Article

Absence of activating mutations of CXCR4 in pituitary tumours

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 209-213

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03629.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2008

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Mutations of the gsp oncogene are responsible for 30-40% of GH-producing pituitary adenomas and 10% of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs). However, the pathogenetic mechanism of the remaining pituitary tumours still remains to be identified. Recently, the interaction between the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor 1 and its receptor CXCR4 was found to play an important role in GH production and cell proliferation in various pituitary adenoma cell lines. As CXCR4 is a Gi-coupled chemokine receptor, its constitutive activating mutations may be involved in pituitary tumour formation by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-independent, ERK-related pathways. Patients and methods We investigated whether somatic activating-mutations of CXCR4 might be a possible tumourigenic mechanism for gsp-negative GH-secreting pituitary adenomas and NFPAs. Direct sequencing of polymerase chain reaction-amplified products for coding exons of CXCR4 were performed using genomic deoxyribonucleic acid samples from 37 GH-producing pituitary tumour tissues that were negative for the gsp mutation and 14 CXCR4 expressing NFPAs. Results Immunohistochemical analyses and double immunofluorescent staining of sectioned paraffin-embedded pituitary tissues revealed that CXCR4 is highly expressed in GH-producing pituitary adenomas and NFPAs. Direct sequencing showed that two synonymous mutations in exon 2 (87 C > T and 414 C > T) were detected in 4 out of 51 pituitary tumours. Conclusion Our results indicate that an activating mutation of the CXCR4 may not be a common pathogenetic mechanism in GH-producing pituitary tumours and NFPAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available