4.4 Article

Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy: a surgery-sparing treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism

Journal

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 4, Pages 542-548

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03238.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To describe our 3-year experience in the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT), as an alternative to surgery for the management of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (p-HPT). Design Prospective study with a mean follow-up of 19.6 +/- 10.6 months. Patients Our study population included 19 consecutive high risk patients with p-HPT, who met the criteria for surgery. Measurements Under ultrasonic guidance, ethanol (95%) was injected into parathyroid glands with a volume of >= 0.15 cm(3). With the aim of normalizing intact parathormone (iPTH) values, repeated ethanol injections were carried out, in an interval of 2 weeks, until normalization of iPTH was reached or until no residual blood supply was detected by ultrasound in the gland. Biochemical parameters were monitored throughout the study. Results At 6-month follow-up, normalization of iPTH levels (10-65 ng/l) was achieved in 11 (58%) patients (responders). Of the eight remaining patients (nonresponders), six patients had reduced (but not normalized) iPTH levels and two patients required parathyroid surgery. Seventeen (11 responders and 6 nonresponders) of the 19 patients (89.5%) became normocalcaemic (serum Ca <= 2.57 mmol/l) and remained so for a mean follow-up of 21 months (8-39 months). The odds ratio (P < 0.05) of response vs. no response to PEIT was 16.7-fold for pretreatment iPTH < 200 vs. > 200 ng/l. The only complication was a transient dysphonia noticed in three patients. Conclusions PEIT is a safe and effective nonsurgical treatment for patients with p-HPT, who are unsuitable for surgical intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available