4.2 Article

Cortical Brain Connectivity and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure

Journal

CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 224-229

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1550059414529765

Keywords

congestive heart failure; electroencephalography; B-type natriuretic peptide; connectivity and graph theory; characteristic path length

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and Research MIUR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain has a high level of complexity and needs continuous oxygen supply. So it is clear that any pathological condition, or physiological (aging) change, in the cardiovascular system affects functioning of the central nervous system. We evaluated linear aspects of the relationship between the slowness of cortical rhythms, as revealed by the modulation of a graph connectivity parameter, and congestive heart failure (CHF), as a reflection of neurodegenerative processes. Eyes-closed resting electroencephalographic (EEG) data of 10 patients with CHF were recorded by 19 electrodes positioned according the international 10-20 system. Graph theory function (normalized characteristic path length.) was applied to the undirected and weighted networks obtained by lagged linear coherence evaluated by eLORETA software, therefore getting rid of volumetric propagation influences. The EEG frequency bands of interest were: delta (2-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha 1 (8-10.5 Hz), alpha 2 (10.5-13 Hz), beta 1 (13-20 Hz), beta 2 (20-30 Hz), and gamma (30-40 Hz). The analysis between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) values and. showed positive correlation in delta, associated with a negative correlation in alpha 2 band. Namely, the higher the severity of the disease (as revealed by the BNP vales), the higher the. in delta, and lower in alpha 2 band. Results suggest that delta and alpha. indices are good markers of the severity of CHF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available