4.7 Article

Validation of DNA Methylation to Predict Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Use of xMELP

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 249-258

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.229781

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Perelman School of Medicine Hematologic Malignancies Translational Center of Excellence
  2. American Cancer Society [IRG-78-002-35]
  3. National Institutes of Health [1R21CA185365-01, 1R01CA149566-01A1]
  4. Veterans Affairs Administration [1I01BX000918-01]
  5. Integrated Genetic and Epigenetic Prognostication for Acute Myeloid Leukemia [5R21CA185365-02 (PDQ5)]
  6. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR000003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Epigenetic dysregulation involving alterations in DNA methylation is a hallmark of various types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although specific cancer types and clinical aggressiveness of tumors can be determined by DNA methylation status, the assessment of DNA methylation at multiple loci is not routinely performed in the clinical laboratory. METHODS: We recently described a novel microsphere-based assay for multiplex evaluation of DNA methylation. In the current study, we validated and used an improved assay [ termed expedited microsphere HpaII small fragment Enrichment by Ligation-mediated PCR (xMELP)] that can be performed with appropriate clinical turnaround time. RESULTS: Using the xMELP assay in conjunction with a new 17-locus random forest classifier that has been trained using 344 AML samples, we were able to segregate an independent cohort of 70 primary AML patients into methylation-determined subgroups with significantly distinct mortality risk (P = 0.009). We also evaluated precision, QC parameters, and preanalytic variables of the xMELP assay and determined the sensitivity of the random forest classifier score to failure at 1 or more loci. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that xMELP performance is suitable for implementation in the clinical laboratory and predicts AML outcome in an independent patient cohort. (C) 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available