4.7 Article

High-Sensitivity Troponin as a Predictor of Cardiac Events and Mortality in the Stable Dialysis Population

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 389-398

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.207142

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is a biomarker used in diagnosing myocardial injury. The clinical utility and the variation of this biomarker over time remain unclear in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. We sought to determine whether hs-cTnT concentrations were predictive of myocardial infarction (MI) and death and to examine hs-cTnT variability over a 1-year period. METHODS: A total of 393 nonacute HD and PD patients (70% HD and 30% PD) were followed in a prospective observational study for new MI and death. RESULTS: Median hs-cTnT was 57 ng/L (interquartile range, 36-101 ng/L) with no observed difference between HD and PD patients (P = 0.11). Incremental increases in mortality (P = 0.024) and MI (P = 0.001) were observed with increasing hs-cTnT quartiles. MI incidence increased significantly across quartiles in both HD and PD patients (P = 0.012 and P = 0.025, respectively), whereas mortality increased only in HD patients (P = 0.015). For every increase of 25 ng/L in hs-cTnT, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.10 for mortality in the whole group (95% CI, 1.04-1.16, P = 0.001) and 1.16 for MI (95% CI, 1.08-1.23, P < 0.001). Adjusted HR for mortality was 1.07 (95% CI, 1.01-1.15, P = 0.04) and 1.14 for MI (95% CI, 1.06-1.22, P < 0.001). Changes in hs-cTnT from baseline concentrations after 1 year were minimal (55 ng/L vs 53 ng/L, P = 0.22) even in patients who had an MI (P = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: hs-cTnT appears to have a useful role in predicting MI and death in the dialysis population. Over a 1-year period concentrations remained stable even in patients who sustained a new cardiac event. (C) 2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available