4.7 Article

Lateral Flow Assay with Near-Infrared Dye for Multiplex Detection

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 641-648

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.200360

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Lateral flow assays (LFAs) are popular point-of-care diagnostic tools because they are rapid and easy to use. Nevertheless, they often lack analytical sensitivity and quantitative output and may be difficult to multiplex, limiting their usefulness in biomarker measurement. As a proof-of-concept study, we detail the design of a quantitative, multiplex LFA with readily available near-infrared (NIR) detection to improve analytical sensitivity. METHODS: NIR dye was conjugated to selected antibodies and incorporated into LFAs. We used singleplex, optimized NIR-LFAs to measure interleukin (IL)-6 from 0 to 200 pg/mL and developed duplex assays to simultaneously measure IL-6 from 0 to 100 pg/mL (0 to 4.5 pmol/L) and C-reactive protein (CRP) from 50 to 2500 ng/mL (0.4 to 20 nmol/L) on a single test strip. Assays were tested on 60 different spiked samples and compared to ELISA results. RESULTS: NIR-LFAs detected IL-6 in a 10% plasma matrix with a limit of detection of 4 pg/mL (182 fmol/L) and a CV <7%. Duplex NIR-LFAs quantitatively measured IL-6 and CRP concentrations simultaneously. Values strongly correlated to ELISA measurements, with R-2 values of 0.9825 and 0.9711 for IL-6 and CRP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NIR-LFAs exhibit quantitative measurement at pg/ mL concentrations owing to a high signal-to-background ratio and robust detection antibody clearance through the test strip. Moreover, NIR-LFAs are able to detect molecules present at vastly different concentrations in multiplex format and compare favorably to ELISAs. LFAs with direct NIR detection may be a valuable tool for biomarker evaluation in the point-of-care setting. c (C) 2013 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available