4.7 Article

Amyloid-β(1-42), Total Tau, and Phosphorylated Tau as Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 248-253

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130518

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: To improve ante mortem diagnostic accuracy of Alzheimer disease (AD), measurement of the biomarkers amyloid-beta(1-42) (A beta 42), total tau (Tau), and tau phosphorylated at threonine(181) (pTau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been proposed. We have used these markers and evaluated their performance. METHODS: From January 2001 to January 2007, we assessed A beta 42, Tau, and pTau by commercial ELISAs in CSF from 248 consecutive AD patients and 131 patients with subjective memory complaints attending our outpatient memory clinic. Diagnoses were made blind to the results of the biomarker assays. We assessed sensitivity and specificity and analyzed trends over time. RESULTS: Interassay CVs from analysis of pools of surplus CSF specimens were mean 11.3% (SD 4.9%) for A beta 42; 9.3% (1.5%) for Tau, and 9.4% (2.5%) for pTau respectively (n = 7-18). To achieve 85% sensitivity: cutoff values were 550 (95% CI 531-570) ng/L for A beta 42; 375 (325-405) ng/L for Tau, and 52 (48-56) ng/L for pTau. Corresponding specificities were 83% (95% CI 76%-89%) for A beta 42, 78% (70%-85%) for Tau, and 68% (60%-77%) for pTau. Logistic regression to investigate the simultaneous impact of the 3 CSF biomarkers on the diagnosis yielded a sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 82.7%, at a discrimination line of A beta 42 = 373 + 0.82 X Tau. The area under the ROC curves of Tau and pTau showed significant fluctuation over time. CONCLUSIONS: CSF biomarkers A beta 42 and Tau can be used as a diagnostic aid in AD. pTau did not have additional value over these 2 markers. Cutoff values, sensitivities, specificities, and discrimination lines depend on the patient groups studied and laboratory experience. (C) 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available