4.6 Article

Quantitative lipopolysaccharide analysis using HPLC/MS/MS and its combination with the limulus amebocyte lysate assay

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 7, Pages 1363-1369

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.D059725

Keywords

inflammation; lipoprotein; lipid transfer protein; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; sepsis; human; mouse; diagnostic tool; mass spectrometry; liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

Funding

  1. INSERM (Institut National de la Sante Et de la Recherche Medicale)
  2. Regional Council of Bourgogne
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. University of Bourgogne
  5. Fondation de France
  6. Oseo/Banque Publique d'Investissement
  7. French government [ANR-11-LABX-0021-01-Lip-STIC LabEx]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitation of plasma lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) might be used to document Gram-negative bacterial infection. In the present work, LPS-derived 3-hydroxymyristate was extracted from plasma samples with an organic solvent, separated by reversed phase HPLC, and quantitated by MS/MS. This mass assay was combined with the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) bioassay to monitor neutralization of LPS activity in biological samples. The described HPLC/MS/MS method is a reliable, practical, accurate, and sensitive tool to quantitate LPS. The combination of the LAL and HPLC/MS/MS analyses provided new evidence for the intrinsic capacity of plasma lipoproteins and phospholipid transfer protein to neutralize the activity of LPS. In a subset of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, with documented infection but with a negative plasma LAL test, significant amounts of LPS were measured by the HPLC/MS/MS method. Patients with the highest plasma LPS concentration were more severely ill. HPLC/MS/MS is a relevant method to quantitate endotoxin in a sample, to assess the efficacy of LPS neutralization, and to evaluate the proinflammatory potential of LPS in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available