4.7 Article

Intra- and Intersubject Whole Blood/Plasma Cannabinoid Ratios Determined by 2-Dimensional, Electron Impact GGMS with Cryofocusing

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 1188-1195

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.114405

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse
  2. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Whole-blood concentrations of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH) are approximately half of those in plasma due to high plasma protein binding and poor cannabinoid distribution into erythrocytes. Whole blood is frequently the only specimen available in forensic investigations; controlled cannabinoid administration studies provide scientific data for interpretation of cannabinoid tests but usually report plasma concentrations. Whole-blood/plasma cannabinoid ratios from simultaneously collected authentic specimens are rarely reported. METHODS: We collected whole blood for 7 days from 32 individuals residing on a closed research unit. Part of the whole blood was processed to obtain plasma, and the whole blood and plasma were stored at -20 degrees C until analysis by validated 2-dimensional GC-MS methods. RESULTS: We measured whole-blood/plasma cannabinoid ratios in 187 specimen pairs. Median (interquartile range) whole-blood/plasma ratios were 0.39 (0.28-0.48) for THC (n = 75), 0.56 (0.43-0.73) for 11-OH-THC (n = 17), and 0.37 (0.24-0.56) for THCCOOH (n = 187). Intrasubject variability was determined for the first time: 18.1%-56.6% CV (THC) and 10.8%-38.2% CV (THCCOOH). The mean whole-blood/plasma THC ratio was significantly lower than the THCCOOH ratio (P = 0.0001; 4 participants' mean THCCOOH ratios were >0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and intersubject whole-blood/plasma THC and THCCOOH ratios will aid interpretation of whole-blood cannabinoid data. (C) 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available