4.7 Article

Unraveling ambiguous NAT2 genotyping data

Journal

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 1390-1394

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.105569

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 (CoASAc; NAT2, EC 2.3.1.5) is a drug-metabolizing enzyme that displays common polymorphisms leading to impaired drug metabolism and adverse drug effects. Determination of the N-acetyltransferase 2 (arylamine N-acetyltransferase) (NAT2) genotype in clinical practice is hampered by the occurrence of ambiguous haplotype combinations that may lead to patient misclassification. We determined the frequencies for ambiguous NAT2 haplotypes and diplotypes in a white population and investigated the use of PHASE v2.1.1, a statistical program for haplotype reconstruction, to clarify this ambiguity and classify individuals according to their acetylation status. METHODS: By means of allele-specific haplotype mapping and sequencing, we determined the haplotypes for 7 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the NAT2 gene (n = 2624 haplotypes). To test the performance of PHASE, actual genotypes were deconstructed and then reconstructed by haplotype prediction. RESULTS: We identified 21 NAT2 allelic variants, including a new variant allele that combines the singlenucleotide polymorphisms rs1801279, rsl799929, and rs1208. In contrast, the previously described variant alleles *5G, *5J, *6E, *17A, *11A, *11B, and *14B were not identified in the study population. Ambiguous haplotypes were observed in 98 alleles (3.7%), and ambiguous diplotypes were observed in 64 individuals (4.9%). Eleven individuals (0.8%) were misclassified by the use of haplotype prediction. CONCLUSIONs: Ambiguous NAT2 genotyping data are common. Actual NAT2 genotypes cannot be fully determined by haplotype prediction techniques. This study provides real haplotype data that can be used as a guide to convert NAT2 haplotypes and diplotypes into actual genotypes in white individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available