4.4 Article

Thyroid Hormone and Coronary Artery Disease: From Clinical Correlations to Prognostic Implications

Journal

CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 380-385

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/clc.20574

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Overt thyroid dysfunction, hypothyroidism in particular, may lead to coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether more subtle anomalies of thyroid hormone metabolism influence the progression of CAD remains a matter of speculation. Hypothesis; The occurrence of CAD and long-term prognosis in patients without a history of either primary thyroid disease, myocardial infarction, or chronic heart failure is related to serum levels of biologically active free triiodothyronine (fT3). Methods: The cohort consisted Of 1047 clinically and biochemically euthyroid patients (median age 65.6 y and 69% mate) who underwent coronary angiography in our institute for suspected CAD. Results: Lower fT3 levels were predictive of both single-vessel (p = 0.012) and multivessel (p = 0.009) CAD. Through a multivariate logistic regression analysis, fT3 was still linked to the presence of CAD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-0.68, p < 0.001). After a mean follow-up Of 31 months, the survival rate was 95% and total mortality (log-rank 6.75, P = 0.009), as well as cardiac mortality (log-rank 8.26, p = 0.004), was greater among patients with low T3 (fT3<2.10 pg/mL) syndrome. At subsequent multivariate Cox regression an a lysis,the association between low T3 syndrome and survival was maintained (total mortality HR: 1.80, 95% Cl: 1.05-3.10, P = 0.034; cardiac mortality HR: 2.58, 95% Cl: 1.13-5-93, P = 0.025). Conclusions: In this selected population, fT3 levels were inversely correlated to the presence of CAD and low T3 syndrome conferred an adverse prognosis, even after adjusting for traditional coronary risk factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available