4.7 Article

Myeloma-Specific Multiple Peptides Able to Generate Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes: A Potential Therapeutic Application in Multiple Myeloma and Other Plasma Cell Disorders

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 17, Pages 4850-4860

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2776

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1-124929, P50-100007, PO1-78378, PO1155258, RO1-50947]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The efficacy of peptide vaccines may be enhanced by stimulating immune cells with multiple peptides derived from distinct tumor-associated antigens. We have evaluated the heteroclitic XBP1-US184-192 (YISPWILAV), heteroclitic XBP1-SP367-375 (YLFPQLISV), native CD138(260-268) (GLVGLIFAV), and native CS1(239-247) (SLFVLGLFL) peptides, which have strong HLA-A2 affinity and immunogenicity in combination, for their ability to elicit multiple myeloma antigen-specific responses. Experimental Design: Multipeptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (MP CTL) were generated by the stimulation of CD3(+) T lymphocytes from HLA-A2(+) individuals with either autologous mature dendritic cells or T2 cells pulsed with a cocktail of these four peptides. Results: The peptide cocktail did not compromise tumor antigen-specific activity of CTLs. MP-CTLs displayed increased total, effector memory (CCR7(-) CD45RO(+)), and activated (CD69(+)) CD3(+)CD8(+) T lymphocytes. In addition, MP-CTL showed IFN-gamma production, cell proliferation, and cytotoxicity against HLA-A2(+) multiple myeloma cells, including cells of HLA-A2(+) patients with multiple myeloma. Importantly, MP-CTLs showed specific responses in functional assays to each relevant peptide but not to an irrelevant HLA-A2-specific CMV pp65 (NLVPMVATV) peptide. Conclusions: These results highlight the potential therapeutic application of vaccination with a cocktail of HLA-A2-specific peptides to induce CTLs with a broad spectrum of immune responses against multiple myeloma antigens. Clin Cancer Res; 18(17); 4850-60. (C) 2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available