4.7 Article

Phase II Trial of Temozolomide in Patients with Relapsed Sensitive or Refractory Small Cell Lung Cancer, with Assessment of Methylguanine- DNA Methyltransferase as a Potential Biomarker

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 1138-1145

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2059

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck Co., Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of temozolomide in patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Experimental Design: Patients with disease progression after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens received temozolomide at 75 mg/m(2)/d for 21 days of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate [ORR; complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR)], which was evaluated separately in sensitive and refractory cohorts. In the available tissue, we assessed O(6-)methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status by PCR and MGMT expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: Sixty-four patients were accrued: 48 patients in the sensitive cohort and 16 in the refractory group. One CR and 10 PRs were noted in sensitive patients [ORR, 23%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 12%-37%]. Two PRs were seen in the refractory cohort (ORR, 13%; 95% CI, 2%-38%). As second-and third-line treatment, the ORR was 22% (95% CI, 9%-40%) and 19%( 95% CI, 7%-36%), respectively. Among patients with target brain lesions, 38% had a CR or PR (95% CI, 14%-68%). Grade > 3 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were observed in nine patients (14%). A greater number of cases with methylated MGMT had a response compared to those with unmethylated MGMT (38% vs. 7%; P = 0.08). Conclusion: Temozolomide has activity in relapsed SCLC, particularly for brain metastases. Response to temozolomide may correlate with MGMT methylation in SCLC. Clin Cancer Res; 18(4); 1138-45. (C)2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available