4.7 Article

Analysis of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase ROS1-Positive Tumors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Identification of a FIG-ROS1 Fusion

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 16, Pages 4449-4457

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3351

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To deepen our understanding of mutant ROS1 expression, localization, and frequency in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we developed a highly specific and sensitive immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based assay that is useful for the detection of wild-type and mutant ROS1. Experimental Design: We analyzed 556 tumors with the ROS1 D4D6 rabbit monoclonal antibody IHC assay to assess ROS1 expression levels and localization. A subset of tumors was analyzed by FISH to determine the percentage of these tumors harboring ROS1 translocations. Using specific and sensitive IHC assays, we analyzed the expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), EGFR L858R, and EGFR E746-A750del mutations in a subset of lung tumors, including those expressing ROS1. Results: In our NSCLC cohort of Chinese patients, we identified 9 (1.6%) tumors expressing ROS1 and 22 (4.0%) tumors expressing ALK. FISH identified tumors with ALK or ROS1 rearrangements, and IHC alone was capable of detecting all cases with ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. ROS1 fusion partners were determined by reverse transcriptase PCR identifying CD74-ROS1, SLC34A2-ROS1, and FIG-ROS1 fusions. Some of the ALK and ROS1 rearranged tumors may also harbor coexisting EGFR mutations. Conclusions: NSCLC tumors with ROS1 rearrangements are uncommon in the Chinese population and represent a distinct entity of carcinomas. The ROS1 IHC assay described here is a valuable tool for identifying patients expressing mutant ROS1 and could be routinely applied in clinical practice to detect lung cancers that may be responsive to targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 18(16); 4449-57. (C)2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available