4.7 Article

Distinct p53 Gene Signatures Are Needed to Predict Prognosis and Response to Chemotherapy in ER-Positive and ER-Negative Breast Cancers

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 2591-2601

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1045

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  3. Commonwealth Cancer Fundation
  4. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  5. Ministere Francais des Affaires Etrangeres et Europeennes
  6. College National des Gynecologues et Obstetriciens Francais
  7. Fondation de France
  8. Fondazione Michelangelo ONLUS
  9. American Society of Clinical Oncology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and -negative (ER) breast cancers are molecularly distinct diseases. We hypothesized that p53 mutations may lead to different transcriptional changes and carry different prognostic value in these two different types of cancers. Experimental Design: We developed a 39-gene p53 signature derived from 213 ER+ and a separate 30-gene signature from 38 ER- cancers with known mutation status and tested their prognostic and chemotherapy response predictive values in ER+ and ER- cancers, respectively. Results: External validation to predict p53 status (n = 103) showed sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 54% for the 39-gene signature, and 82% and 61% for the 30-gene signature. The 39-gene signature was predictive of worse distant metastasis free survival in ER+ cancers in two separate prognostic data sets (n = 255, HR: 2.3, P = 0.005 and n = 198, HR: 2.17, P = 0.09). It also predicted for poor prognosis even with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (n = 277, HR = 2.43, P < 0.0001) but it was not prognostic in ER- cancers. It was also associated with higher chemotherapy sensitivity in ER+ but not in ER- cancers. The prognostic and predictive values remained significant in multivariate analysis. The 30-gene, ER-, p53 signature showed no prognostic or predictive values in ER+ cancers but it was associated with better prognosis in ER- cancers. It also had no chemotherapy response predictive value in ER- or ER+ cancers. Conclusions: P53 dysfunction is prognostically most relevant in ER+ cancers and supports the hypothesis that different predictive or prognostic markers will be needed for different molecular subsets of breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 17(8); 2591-601. (C)2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available