4.7 Article

Targeting Tumor-Associated Endothelial Cells: Anti-VEGFR2 Immunoliposomes Mediate Tumor Vessel Disruption and Inhibit Tumor Growth

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 454-464

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1102

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. SAKK-Amgen grant
  2. Gebert-Ruf Foundation
  3. Cancer League of Basel
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. Desiree and Niels Yde Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Angiogenesis is a key process in tumor progression. By binding VEGF, VEGF receptor-2 (VEGFR2) is a main signaling transducer in tumor-associated angiogenesis. Accordingly, therapeutic approaches against the VEGF/VEGFR2 signaling axis have been designed. However, an efficient and specific chemotherapeutic targeting of tumor-associated endothelial cells has not yet been achieved. Experimental Design: We have employed anti-VEGFR2 antibodies covalently linked to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) to specifically ablate tumor-associated endothelial cells in the Rip1Tag2 mouse model of insulinoma, in the MMTV-PyMT mouse model of breast cancer, and in the HT-29 human colon cancer xenograft transplantation model. Results: In each model, anti-VEGFR2-targeted immunoliposomes (ILs) loaded with doxorubicin (anti-VEGFR2-ILs-dox) were superior in therapeutic efficacy to empty liposomes, empty anti-VEGFR2-ILs, antibodies alone, and PLD. Efficacy was similar to that of the oral VEGFR1, -2, and -3 inhibitor PTK787. Detailed histopathologic and molecular analysis revealed a strong antiangiogenic effect of anti-VEGFR2ILs-dox, and the observed antiangiogenic therapy was significantly more efficient in reducing tumor burden in well-vascularized transgenic mouse models as compared with the less-vascularized xenograft model. Conclusions: Anti-VEGFR2 ILs provide a highly efficient approach to selectively deplete VEGFR2-expressing tumor vasculature. They offer a novel and promising anticancer strategy. Clin Cancer Res; 18(2); 454-64. (C) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available