4.7 Article

An Epigenetic Marker Panel for Detection of Lung Cancer Using Cell-Free Serum DNA

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 17, Issue 13, Pages 4494-4503

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3436

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, Oncomethylome Sciences, SA [U01-CA84986]
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  3. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We investigated the feasibility of detecting aberrant DNA methylation of some novel and known genes in the serum of lung cancer patients. Experimental Design: To determine the analytic sensitivity, we examined the tumor and the matched serum DNA for aberrant methylation of 15 gene promoters from 10 patients with primary lung tumors by using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. We then tested this 15-gene set to identify the more useful DNA methylation changes in the serum of a limited number of lung cancer patients and controls. In an independent set, we tested the six most promising genes (APC, CDH1, MGMT, DCC, RASSF1A, and AIM1) for further elucidation of the diagnostic application of this panel of markers. Results: Promoter hypermethylation of at least one of the genes studied was detected in all 10 lung primary tumors. In majority of cases, aberrant methylation in serum DNA was accompanied by methylation in the matched tumor samples. In the independent set, using a single gene that had 100% specificity (DCC), 35.5% (95% CI: 25-47) of the 76 lung cancer patients were correctly identified. For patients without methylated DCC, addition of a logistic regression score that was based on the five remaining genes improved sensitivity from 35.5% to 75% (95% CI: 64-84) but decreased the specificity from 100% to 73% (95% CI: 54-88). Conclusion: This approach needs to be evaluated in a larger test set to determine the role of this gene set in early detection and surveillance of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 17(13); 4494-503. (C) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available